wsbpel

← back

138 messages · 70 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 RE: [wsbpel] Issue 247 - Applied "[ehta, Uinkesh \(TR - Bustin\)" 2006-07-04 17:30
00001 Section 10.4 - Reply Dieter Koenig1 2006-07-06 16:49
00002 Re: [wsbpel] Section 10.4 - Reply Alex Yiu 2006-07-06 18:47
00003 Returned mail: Data format error [email protected] 2006-07-09 09:45
00004 onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema? Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-11 13:49
00005 RE: [wsbpel] onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema? Mark Ford 2006-07-11 17:53
00006 Re: [wsbpel] onEvent inconsistency between spec & schema? Alex Yiu 2006-07-11 19:48
00007 Agenda for 7/12! John Evdemon 2006-07-12 12:53
00008 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 302 - Amended Voted on proposal, approved onJuly 12. Rania Khalaf 2006-07-12 16:54
00009 Groups - New Action Item #0132 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN... [email protected] 2006-07-12 16:58
00010 Groups - New Action Item #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN... [email protected] 2006-07-12 16:58
00011 Groups - Action Item Modified: #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN... [email protected] 2006-07-12 16:59
00012 Groups - Action Item Modified: #0133 edit in the 82.3 lost section AN... [email protected] 2006-07-12 17:00
00013 Groups - New Action Item #0134 Add voted on resolution of 302 t... [email protected] 2006-07-12 17:04
00014 Quick summary of 7/12 conference call John Evdemon 2006-07-12 17:40
00015 Issue 303 proposed resolution Mark Ford 2006-07-12 17:46
00016 Proposal: "code freeze" John Evdemon 2006-07-12 18:11
00017 Groups - 2006-07-12 WS-BPEL Minutes (2006-07-12 WS-BPEL Minutes.html) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-12 19:12
00018 Groups - TC Conf Call modified [email protected] 2006-07-12 19:22
00019 Groups - TC Conf Call modified [email protected] 2006-07-12 19:37
00020 Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Alex Yiu 2006-07-13 00:31
00021 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 303 proposed resolution Alex Yiu 2006-07-13 01:04
00022 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-13 01:37
00023 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-13 01:41
00024 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Alex Yiu 2006-07-13 02:24
00025 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-13 02:24
00026 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-13 03:07
00027 RE: [wsbpel] Proposal: "code freeze" Martin Chapman 2006-07-13 15:27
00028 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-13 16:44
00029 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-13 17:20
00030 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-13 20:47
00031 RE: [wsbpel] Proposal: "code freeze" John Evdemon 2006-07-13 20:56
00032 Groups - TC Conf Call modified [email protected] 2006-07-14 01:25
00033 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-15 20:50
00034 Initial example violates SA00050? Thomas Schulze 2006-07-17 09:10
00035 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-17 21:55
00036 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 291 - Proposal for vote Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-17 23:56
00037 spec editing status - volunteers needed! Diane Jordan 2006-07-18 20:38
00038 Fw: Initial example violates SA00050? Thomas Schulze 2006-07-19 11:30
00039 Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed! Rania Khalaf 2006-07-19 14:25
00040 Action Item 37 is no longer applicable and should be marked closed. Rania Khalaf 2006-07-19 14:31
00041 Proposed schedule John Evdemon 2006-07-19 15:24
00042 Re: [wsbpel] spec editing status - volunteers needed! Eieter Loenig1 2006-07-19 15:39
00043 Action Item 52 can be closed. Monica J. Martin 2006-07-19 16:37
00044 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 294.2 - proposal for vote Alex Yiu 2006-07-19 16:55
00045 Proposed action item: Bug in Initial example - violates SA00050 Eiane Kordan 2006-07-19 17:17
00046 Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00050? Alex Yiu 2006-07-19 17:26
00047 Groups - Action Item Closed: #0037 Consider moving section 4 somewh... [email protected] 2006-07-20 15:28
00048 Groups - Action Item Closed: #0052 Put "Each business process MUST ... [email protected] 2006-07-20 15:29
00049 Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049? Thomas Schulze 2006-07-20 21:44
00050 issue 291 - proposal to vote Diane Jordan 2006-07-20 21:57
00051 issue 247 - folllow up questions on static analysis table Diane Jordan 2006-07-20 22:15
00052 Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049? Alex Yiu 2006-07-20 22:22
00053 new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs tobe unique across all portTypes and operations Alex Yiu 2006-07-20 22:53
00054 Re: [wsbpel] Initial example violates SA00049? Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-20 23:50
00055 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-21 00:05
00056 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Thomas Schulze 2006-07-21 09:45
00057 New Issue - Remove query language in favor of expression language for <to> Chris Keller 2006-07-21 16:37
00058 subscriptions to the BPEL TC public comment list Diane Jordan 2006-07-21 17:59
00059 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-21 20:32
00060 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-21 21:00
00061 Issue - 304 - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations ws&#45;bpel issues list editor 2006-07-21 22:47
00062 Issue - 305 - Remove query language in favor of expression language for <to> ws&#45;bpel issues list editor 2006-07-21 22:47
00063 Groups - Current WS-BPEL Issues List (WS_BPEL_issues_list.html) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-21 22:50
00064 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-21 23:32
00065 Agenda for July 26 TC meeting Diane Jordan 2006-07-24 02:14
00066 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Thomas Schulze 2006-07-24 09:27
00067 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 11:45
00068 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Thomas Schulze 2006-07-24 13:17
00069 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 13:54
00070 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Shomas Rchulze 2006-07-24 14:09
00071 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 14:14
00072 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-24 14:32
00073 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Shomas Rchulze 2006-07-24 14:40
00074 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations Ron Ten-Hove 2006-07-24 14:58
00075 Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Orasad Xendluri 2006-07-24 15:42
00076 Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Alex Yiu 2006-07-24 20:11
00077 Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName ofa fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 21:45
00078 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Assaf Arkin 2006-07-24 22:30
00079 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 22:52
00080 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Assaf Arkin 2006-07-24 23:06
00081 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Alex Yiu 2006-07-24 23:28
00082 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 23:41
00083 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-24 23:57
00084 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Alex Yiu 2006-07-25 00:09
00085 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Alex Yiu 2006-07-25 00:17
00086 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether theQName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Dieter Koenig1 2006-07-25 18:32
00087 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Prasad Yendluri 2006-07-25 20:01
00088 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whetherthe QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Alex Yiu 2006-07-25 21:23
00089 Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Alex Yiu 2006-07-26 07:41
00090 Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 304 - discussion - clarification on whether theQName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operat ions Dieter Koenig1 2006-07-26 15:22
00091 Groups - proposed resolution for issue 304 (Issue 304.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-26 16:28
00092 [wsbpel] Issue 303 resolution Mark Ford 2006-07-26 16:46
00093 Groups - New Action Item #0135 Add a 2nd "MUST be" to line 821 ... [email protected] 2006-07-26 17:00
00094 Groups - New Action Item #0136 Section 10.4 - Providing Web Ser... [email protected] 2006-07-26 17:18
00095 Groups - Action Item Closed: #0136 Section 10.4 - Providing Web Ser... [email protected] 2006-07-26 17:21
00096 issue 291 - final resolution Diane Jordan 2006-07-26 17:32
00097 issue 247 - additional changes for the static analysis table Diane Jordan 2006-07-26 17:39
00098 Groups - BPEL TC Conference call modified [email protected] 2006-07-26 20:45
00099 Groups - BPEL TC Conference call modified [email protected] 2006-07-26 20:49
00100 Groups - TC Conf Call modified [email protected] 2006-07-26 20:51
00101 Groups - TC Conf Call modified [email protected] 2006-07-26 20:52
00102 Groups - Action Item Closed: #0071 Consistent use of fromPart/toPar... [email protected] 2006-07-27 07:40
00103 Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.164.doc (wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.164.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 12:08
00104 Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.165.doc (wsbpel-specification-draft revision 1.165.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 12:09
00105 Issue 305 Mark Ford 2006-07-27 16:18
00106 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305 Monica J. Martin 2006-07-27 16:59
00107 RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Mark Ford 2006-07-27 17:43
00108 Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (with mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006-MU.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 20:53
00109 Groups - idate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (no mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 20:56
00110 candidate committee draft for review Diane Jordan 2006-07-27 21:57
00111 Groups - Variable Access In Comp Handler (VarAccessCH.png) (formerly image006.png) modified [email protected] 2006-07-27 22:00
00112 Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (HTML version with No change mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006.htm) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 22:53
00113 Groups - WS-BPEL 2.0 Candidate Committee Draft July 27, 2006 (HTML version with change mark-up) (wsbpel-specification-draft-July27-2006-MU.htm) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-27 22:54
00114 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-28 00:07
00115 RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Mark Ford 2006-07-28 00:59
00116 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic) Alex Yiu 2006-07-28 01:27
00117 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Alex Yiu 2006-07-28 02:17
00118 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic) Alex Yiu 2006-07-28 02:25
00119 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic) Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-28 04:17
00120 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-28 04:18
00121 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Alex Yiu 2006-07-28 05:48
00122 RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matching logic) Mark Ford 2006-07-28 12:55
00123 RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Mark Ford 2006-07-28 13:07
00124 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic) Danny van der Rijn 2006-07-28 13:35
00125 htm version of candidate committee draft Diane Jordan 2006-07-28 13:41
00126 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matching logic) Assaf Arkin 2006-07-28 16:04
00127 Groups - New Action Item #0138 replace NCName with BPELVariable... [email protected] 2006-07-28 16:47
00128 RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Mark Ford 2006-07-28 18:48
00129 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion (matchinglogic) Alex Yiu 2006-07-28 22:21
00130 Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 280 - proposal draft for discussion Alex Yiu 2006-07-29 01:14
00131 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305 Thomas Schulze 2006-07-29 08:30
00132 RE: [wsbpel] Issue 305 "[ark Gord" 2006-07-29 12:50
00133 Groups - Isse 305 edits for queryLanguage (Issue-305-wsbpel-specification-draft.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-30 23:39
00134 Issue 305 proposal for discussion Mark Ford 2006-07-31 00:07
00135 Agenda for Aug 2 TC meeting Diane Jordan 2006-07-31 02:44
00136 Groups - Issue-305-wsbpel-specification-draft_AYIU.doc uploaded [email protected] 2006-07-31 08:51
00137 Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305 proposal for discussion Alex Yiu 2006-07-31 09:12