Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations

Hi Thomas,

Why do we need such a limitation?  The local part is just an NCName 
(i.e. the LocalPart of the QName).

Regards,
Prasad

Thomas Schulze wrote:

>Hi Prasad,
>
>so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypes and
>operatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right?
>
>Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
>       Thomas Schulze
>
>  
>