Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
Hi Prasad,
a portType definition like the following would lead to problems, IMHO:
<portType name="My.Port.Type">
<operation name="My.Operation">
...
</operation>
</portType>
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thomas Schulze
Prasad Yendluri
<pyendluri@webmet
hods.com> To
Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
24.07.2006 15:53 cc
,
,
Subject
Re: [wsbpel] new issue -
clarification on whether the QName
of a fault needs to be unique
across all portTypes and operations
Hi Thomas,
Why do we need such a limitation? The local part is just an NCName
(i.e. the LocalPart of the QName).
Regards,
Prasad
Thomas Schulze wrote:
>Hi Prasad,
>
>so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypes
and
>operatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right?
>
>Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Thomas Schulze
>
>
>