Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations

Hi Prasad,

in case this portType contains a fault and you like to reference it in
<catch> according to your proposal, the faultName QName would look like
this:

      targetNamespace:My.Port.Type.My.Operation.faultName

Right? The portType "My" containing the operation "Port" defining the
faultName "Type.My.Operation.faultName" is not meant here.

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

       Thomas Schulze

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, IBM Lab Boeblingen
WSS - Business Process Solutions - BPC Development 2
Schoenaicher Strasse 220, 71032 Boeblingen, Kst. 3056, Geb. 7103-02, Raum
0006
Phone: +49-7031-16-3094 (T/L: *120-3094); E-Mail: 

                                                                       
             Prasad Yendluri                                           
             <pyendluri@webmet                                         
             hods.com>                                                  To
                                       Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
             24.07.2006 16:14                                           cc
                                       ,            
                                       ,        
                                            
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [wsbpel] new issue -        
                                       clarification on whether the QName
                                       of a fault needs to be unique   
                                       across all portTypes and operations
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       

Hi Thomas,

I do not see a problem. Can you please explain why you think there would be
a problem?

Regards,
Prasad

Thomas Schulze wrote:
      Hi Prasad,

      a portType definition like the following would lead to problems,
      IMHO:

          <portType name="My.Port.Type">
              <operation name="My.Operation">
                  ...
              </operation>
          </portType>

      Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

             Thomas Schulze

                   Prasad Yendluri

                   <pyendluri@webmet

                   hods.com>
      To
                                             Thomas
      Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
                   24.07.2006 15:53
      cc
                                             ,

                                             ,

                                             

      Subject
                                             Re: [wsbpel] new issue -

                                             clarification on whether the
      QName
                                             of a fault needs to be unique

                                             across all portTypes and
      operations

      Hi Thomas,

      Why do we need such a limitation?  The local part is just an NCName
      (i.e. the LocalPart of the QName).

      Regards,
      Prasad

      Thomas Schulze wrote:

            Hi Prasad,

            so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that
            portTypes

      and

            operatins must not contain the "." character when used with
            BPEL. Right?

            Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

                  Thomas Schulze