Title: Message
Given
that we don't meet next until the proposed freeze date, how can we agree this
date in time!!!!
How
about making it the 21st (the Friday), giving the opportunity to vote/discuss on
Wednesday,
but if
approved nobody should be surprised and complain if there is not enough
time!
Does
that make sense?
Martin.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Evdemon
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006
7:12 PM
To:
Subject: [wsbpel]
Proposal: "code freeze"
Per discussion at
the beginning of today’s call.
I’d like to propose
the TC consider a code freeze (as Ron aptly put it). This means we
would not open any existing issues or raise any new issues for any reason –
essentially drawing a line in the sand so that we can publish a Committee
Draft out and move to a Public Review.
As Alex correctly
stated we were supposed to have a feature freeze a year ago. While
this generally happened, I’d like to also propose a “Q/A freeze” so that we
can establish a shipping schedule and stick to it. I’d prefer to try and
get this done by the end of the calendar year. My biggest concern is the
new IP Rules that kick in on 4/2007 – we should really try to get done before
this hits.
I believe that
calendar year end is an ambitious, but achievable
deadline.
Here are some
recommended milestones to consider – please review and comment (all
dates are merely suggestions at this point):
Code freeze:
7/19/2006
Updates to
Committee Draft and Schema are completed: 8/2/2006
Draft for 60-Day
Public Review: 8/9/2006 – 10/4/2006
F2F to review
Public Comments: 10/9/2006 – 10/11/2006
Committee
Specification: 11/1/2006
Vote for
OASIS Standard:
11/8/2006
OASIS Standard:
12/2006 (depends upon Committee Specification vote)
John
