| 00000 |
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-01 18:37 |
| 00001 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-01 18:59 |
| 00002 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-01 19:21 |
| 00004 |
(no subject) |
Snknown
|
2003-11-01 21:58 |
| 00003 |
Issue - 80 - Clarify Fault Handler Selection When Fault Data is Absent |
Fletcher, Tony
|
2003-11-02 02:20 |
| 00005 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-02 07:20 |
| 00006 |
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute? |
"Ratish Shatte"
|
2003-11-02 07:34 |
| 00007 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-02 18:29 |
| 00008 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-02 19:10 |
| 00009 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-02 21:38 |
| 00010 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-02 21:46 |
| 00011 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-03 04:46 |
| 00012 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-03 06:16 |
| 00013 |
Issue - 81 - Are start activities that aren't createInstance activities legal? |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-03 14:54 |
| 00014 |
Issue - 82 - description of abstract processes in spec |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-03 14:54 |
| 00015 |
Issue - 83 - Garbage Collecting Compensation Handlers |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-03 14:54 |
| 00016 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType |
Frank Leymann
|
2003-11-03 15:27 |
| 00017 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-03 16:22 |
| 00018 |
Issue - 72 - Revised proposal to discuss |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-03 16:56 |
| 00019 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Revised proposal to discuss |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-03 17:24 |
| 00020 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Revised proposal to discuss |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-03 17:49 |
| 00021 |
Issue - 2- Compensation and sub-functions |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-03 18:10 |
| 00022 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-03 18:23 |
| 00023 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - Subfunctions and XPATHS |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-03 18:45 |
| 00024 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Revised proposal to discuss |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-03 20:45 |
| 00025 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-04 05:52 |
| 00029 |
(no subject) |
Snknown
|
2003-11-04 12:58 |
| 00031 |
(no subject) |
Snknown
|
2003-11-04 13:58 |
| 00026 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-04 16:52 |
| 00027 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-04 17:23 |
| 00028 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-04 17:55 |
| 00030 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-04 18:20 |
| 00032 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-04 18:32 |
| 00033 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-04 18:46 |
| 00034 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-04 18:54 |
| 00035 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-04 18:59 |
| 00036 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-04 19:05 |
| 00037 |
Groups - Minutes WS BPEL TC Oct 29 2003.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-04 21:12 |
| 00038 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType |
Yunker, John
|
2003-11-04 21:33 |
| 00039 |
Issue - 84 - Require Static Analysis Description & List |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-05 19:22 |
| 00040 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-05 21:24 |
| 00041 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-05 21:46 |
| 00042 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-05 23:57 |
| 00043 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-06 06:14 |
| 00044 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-06 19:19 |
| 00045 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-06 19:29 |
| 00046 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-06 20:13 |
| 00047 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-07 16:15 |
| 00048 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-07 16:34 |
| 00049 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-07 17:30 |
| 00050 |
Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-07 17:48 |
| 00051 |
RE: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Edwin Khodabakchian
|
2003-11-07 18:36 |
| 00052 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-07 18:42 |
| 00053 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-07 18:52 |
| 00054 |
Agenda for Nov. 12 TC conference call |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-07 22:27 |
| 00055 |
Issue 76 - Proposal For Motion |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-08 00:30 |
| 00056 |
Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-08 12:09 |
| 00057 |
RE: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Jean-Jacques Dubray
|
2003-11-08 19:10 |
| 00058 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Monica J. Martin
|
2003-11-10 01:35 |
| 00059 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
Trickovic, Ivana
|
2003-11-10 15:47 |
| 00060 |
Re: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-10 17:50 |
| 00061 |
Re: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-10 17:58 |
| 00062 |
RE: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Edwin Khodabakchian
|
2003-11-10 20:25 |
| 00063 |
RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-10 21:49 |
| 00064 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Eckenfels. Bernd
|
2003-11-10 22:08 |
| 00065 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-10 22:15 |
| 00066 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-11 10:06 |
| 00067 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-11 10:06 |
| 00068 |
Issue 79 - Proposed Resolution |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-11 16:18 |
| 00069 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-11 16:18 |
| 00070 |
Re: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-11 18:30 |
| 00071 |
RE: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-11 19:05 |
| 00072 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Francisco Curbera
|
2003-11-11 20:31 |
| 00073 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-11 20:45 |
| 00074 |
Re: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Danny van der Rijn
|
2003-11-11 20:46 |
| 00075 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-11 20:59 |
| 00076 |
Re: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Danny van der Rijn
|
2003-11-11 21:04 |
| 00077 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-11 21:20 |
| 00078 |
Re: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Danny van der Rijn
|
2003-11-11 21:23 |
| 00079 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 79 - Proposed Resolution |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-11 21:30 |
| 00080 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-11 21:34 |
| 00081 |
RE: [wsbpel] RE: [spell] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote |
Eckenfels. Bernd
|
2003-11-11 21:36 |
| 00082 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - request for discussion |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-11 21:43 |
| 00083 |
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-12 12:53 |
| 00084 |
v2.1 - Workflow is just a Pi process - new paper from CSC, as PDF download |
Ioward @ Rmith
|
2003-11-12 14:11 |
| 00085 |
TIME Difference - TC call is on standard time now! |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-12 15:33 |
| 00086 |
Re: [wsbpel] Sub-functions: some thoughts |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-12 16:14 |
| 00087 |
RE: [wsbpel] TIME Difference - TC call is on standard time now! |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-12 16:31 |
| 00088 |
RE: [wsbpel] v2.1 - Workflow is just a Pi process - new paper from CSC, as PDF download |
Jon Pyke
|
2003-11-12 16:36 |
| 00089 |
Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote (hopefully the final text) |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-12 17:15 |
| 00090 |
Please RSVP for the upcoming F2F Meeting in Melbourne, FL |
John Evdemon
|
2003-11-12 17:43 |
| 00091 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-12 18:19 |
| 00092 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
"Tgo Dorda"
|
2003-11-12 19:42 |
| 00093 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-13 03:49 |
| 00094 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-14 07:47 |
| 00095 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Frank Leymann
|
2003-11-14 08:04 |
| 00096 |
Background to Workflow/Pi Paper: Response to Jon |
Howard N Smith
|
2003-11-14 11:08 |
| 00097 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution |
"Srickovic, Jvana"
|
2003-11-14 15:27 |
| 00098 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-14 20:40 |
| 00099 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-14 20:52 |
| 00100 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-16 04:42 |
| 00101 |
Does better Nath lead to better process |
Jon Pyke
|
2003-11-16 11:16 |
| 00102 |
Issue - 85 - Multiple links with the same source and target |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-17 00:31 |
| 00103 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-17 16:47 |
| 00104 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-17 16:52 |
| 00105 |
Groups - scenarios11_17.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-18 05:48 |
| 00106 |
"Scientific workflow services" workshop |
Savas Parastatidis
|
2003-11-18 14:06 |
| 00107 |
Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-19 01:51 |
| 00108 |
Issue - 77 - Optional Headers |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-19 01:52 |
| 00109 |
RE: Issue - 77 - Optional Headers |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 10:12 |
| 00110 |
RE: Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 10:12 |
| 00111 |
RE: Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 10:23 |
| 00112 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-19 17:52 |
| 00113 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 18:59 |
| 00114 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Rajesh Pradhan
|
2003-11-19 19:10 |
| 00115 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 19:13 |
| 00116 |
Fw: CALL FOR PAPERS: BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FORUM 2004 |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-19 19:34 |
| 00117 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 19:38 |
| 00118 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 19:47 |
| 00119 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 19:54 |
| 00120 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 20:01 |
| 00121 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 20:26 |
| 00122 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 20:31 |
| 00123 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 20:38 |
| 00124 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 20:46 |
| 00125 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-19 20:47 |
| 00126 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 20:57 |
| 00127 |
Groups - Minutes of Conference Call November 12 .doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-19 21:02 |
| 00128 |
Leave of absence |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-19 21:07 |
| 00129 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-19 21:18 |
| 00130 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 21:26 |
| 00131 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-19 22:31 |
| 00132 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-19 22:46 |
| 00133 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Francisco Curbera
|
2003-11-19 23:28 |
| 00134 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-20 00:20 |
| 00135 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-20 00:53 |
| 00136 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-20 00:59 |
| 00137 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-20 06:39 |
| 00138 |
Issue - 85 - Proposal to vote |
Dieter Koenig1
|
2003-11-20 16:40 |
| 00139 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-20 16:53 |
| 00140 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-20 18:24 |
| 00141 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-20 18:38 |
| 00142 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-21 02:49 |
| 00143 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-21 02:49 |
| 00144 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 03:04 |
| 00145 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 03:28 |
| 00146 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-21 15:16 |
| 00147 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-21 16:06 |
| 00148 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-21 16:10 |
| 00149 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Francisco Curbera
|
2003-11-21 16:16 |
| 00150 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 16:39 |
| 00151 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 16:43 |
| 00152 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-21 16:46 |
| 00153 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 16:59 |
| 00154 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-21 19:54 |
| 00155 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 20:18 |
| 00156 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-21 20:29 |
| 00157 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-21 20:35 |
| 00158 |
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft-Nov1703.htm uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-21 21:17 |
| 00159 |
specification working draft uploaded - comments welcome |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-21 21:43 |
| 00160 |
Fw: Agenda for next week - is it ok? |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-23 20:27 |
| 00161 |
RE: [wsbpel] specification working draft uploaded - comments welcome |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-23 22:48 |
| 00162 |
Issue # 62 Proposal to Vote |
Dieter Roller
|
2003-11-24 08:37 |
| 00163 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-24 13:12 |
| 00164 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue # 62 Proposal to Vote |
Satish Thatte
|
2003-11-24 14:47 |
| 00165 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue # 62 Proposal to Vote |
Dieter Roller
|
2003-11-24 15:40 |
| 00166 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-24 16:35 |
| 00167 |
Issue 77 - Proposal to vote |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-24 16:52 |
| 00168 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-24 18:43 |
| 00169 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-24 18:50 |
| 00170 |
New Issue - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 1.2 |
Monica J. Martin
|
2003-11-24 19:30 |
| 00171 |
F2F Hotel |
Martin Chapman
|
2003-11-24 19:38 |
| 00172 |
Hotels for the upcoming F2F (12/9-12/10) |
John Evdemon
|
2003-11-24 20:08 |
| 00173 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote (hopefully the final text) |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-24 23:31 |
| 00174 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-25 03:09 |
| 00175 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-25 03:40 |
| 00176 |
Implementation subgroup plans for Face to face meeting |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-25 03:42 |
| 00177 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Edwin Khodabakchian
|
2003-11-25 03:48 |
| 00178 |
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2003-11-25 12:12 |
| 00179 |
Issue #50 - Proposal to Vote |
Dieter Roller
|
2003-11-25 14:46 |
| 00180 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-25 16:51 |
| 00181 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-25 17:17 |
| 00182 |
Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 1.2 |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-25 18:06 |
| 00183 |
Subject lines of messages about issues |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-25 18:16 |
| 00184 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 1.2 |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-25 18:24 |
| 00185 |
RE: Issue 74 - proposal for vote |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-25 19:21 |
| 00186 |
New Issue - double meaning for supressJoinFailures |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-25 19:27 |
| 00187 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-25 19:57 |
| 00188 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-25 20:34 |
| 00189 |
Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-25 21:11 |
| 00190 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Edwin Khodabakchian
|
2003-11-25 21:28 |
| 00191 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-25 21:31 |
| 00192 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Harvey Reed
|
2003-11-25 21:41 |
| 00193 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-25 21:49 |
| 00194 |
RE: Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Trickovic, Ivana
|
2003-11-26 08:50 |
| 00195 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
Furniss, Peter
|
2003-11-26 09:18 |
| 00196 |
RE: Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2 |
"Fckenfels. Cernd"
|
2003-11-26 10:10 |
| 00197 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ron Ten-Hove
|
2003-11-26 15:15 |
| 00198 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-26 15:35 |
| 00199 |
hotels for the F2F |
Danny van der Rijn
|
2003-11-26 17:35 |
| 00200 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability -SOAP 1.2 |
Monica J. Martin
|
2003-11-26 19:12 |
| 00201 |
Re: [wsbpel] hotels for the F2F |
Diane Jordan
|
2003-11-26 19:18 |
| 00202 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-27 00:44 |
| 00203 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-27 01:05 |
| 00204 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Yaron Goland
|
2003-11-27 01:36 |
| 00205 |
Issue - 87 - Optional SOAP Headers |
ws-bpel issues list editor
|
2003-11-27 15:31 |
| 00206 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 87 - Optional SOAP Headers |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-11-27 19:32 |
| 00207 |
Issue - 62 - Proposal to Vote |
Dieter Roller
|
2003-11-29 08:20 |
| 00208 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Sanjiva Weerawarana
|
2003-11-30 00:37 |
| 00209 |
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks? |
Assaf Arkin
|
2003-11-30 03:57 |
| 00210 |
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions |
Ugo Corda
|
2003-12-01 01:52 |
