← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Issue 79 - Proposed Resolution

From
Ron Ten-Hove <>
Date
2003-11-11T16:18:38+00:00
ID
Thread
Issue 79 - Proposed Resolution
Section 13.6, first paragraph, currently reads:

When the variableAccessSerializable attribute is
set to "yes", the scope provides concurrency control in
governing access to shared variables. Such a scope is called a
serializable scope. Serializable scopes must not be nested. A scope
marked with variableAccessSerializable="yes" must be a leaf
scope.

The final sentence should be modified such that the paragraph should
read a follows:

When the variableAccessSerializable attribute is
set to "yes", the scope provides concurrency control in
governing access to shared variables. Such a scope is called a
serializable scope. Serializable scopes must not be nested. A scope
marked with variableAccessSerializable="yes" must not contain
other serializable scopes, but may contain scopes that are not marked
as serializable. In the latter case, access to shared variables from
within such enclosed scopes is controlled by the enclosing serializable
scope.

    This, I believe, reflects the consensus we arrived at discussing
this issue on the e-mail list. Comments and suggestions for
improvements are always welcome.

Best regards,

-Ron
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread