RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote (hopefully the final text)

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Furniss, Peter [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: 
> Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote (hopefully the final
> text)
> 
> 
> Following the discussion at today's meeting, I think the following is
> most widely acceptable:
> 
> Proposed resolution:
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Given that the scope of BP is confined to the specifications it
> references, and that BPEL is of wider application:
> 
> a) In developing the BPEL language, where reference is made to
> specifications that are in BP 1.0 scope,  the BP 1.0 requirements will
> normally be followed.
> 
> b) Where use-cases and use-case artifacts are in BP 1.0 scope (i.e.
> using
> referenced specifications) they will be BP 1.0 compliant, if possible.
> 
> c) All BPEL implementations SHOULD be configurable such that they can
> participate in BP1.0 compliant interactions. A BPEL implementation MAY
> allow the BP 1.0 configuration to be disabled, even for scenarios
> encompassed by BP 1.0.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> On c), the last comment (not certain who from) on the call 
> was to delete
> the
> second sentence, but from other comments I think the general 
> feeling was
> that
> the longer form clearer.
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> Peter Furniss
> Chief Scientist, Choreology Ltd
> 
>    Cohesions 1.0 (TM)
>    Business transaction management software for application 
> coordination
> 
> web: http://www.choreology.com
> email:  
> phone:  +44 870 739 0066  <-- new, from 4 August 2003
> mobile: +44 7951 536168
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le
> ave_workgroup.php.
> 
>