Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 1.2

From
Ugo Corda <>
Date
2003-11-25T18:24:47+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 1.2
Monica,

 

Regarding BP 1.1, it 
is not connected with attachments any more. There is going to be an AP 1.0 
(Attachment Profile), while BP 1.1 will be just a revision of BP 
1.0.

 

Ugo

  
-----Original Message-----
From: ws-bpel issues list editor 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 
  2003 10:12 AM
To: 
Subject: 
  [wsbpel] Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 
  1.2

  
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. The issues list is 
  posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC 
  pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the 
  most recent document with the title in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL 
  TC document list - the next posting will include this issue. The list 
  editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is 
  announced, is available at this 
  constant URL. 
  Issue - 86 - Addressing Interoperability / Portability - SOAP 
  1.2Status: open
Categories: clarification
Date 
  added: 25 Nov 2003
Submitter: Monica J. Martin
Date 
  submitted: 24 November 2003
Document: BPEL 
  specification
Description: SOAP 1.2 is a direct replacement for SOAP 
  1.1, a current component of BP 1.0. Both are instances of a WSDL protocol 
  binding. SOAP 1.2 is a full W3C Recommendation while SOAP 1.1 is only a Note. 
  It is expected that WS-I BP 2.0 will include SOAP 1.2 and WSDL 1.2/2.0. 
  Therefore, we should consider how we address SOAP 1.2 consistent with our 
  current and future resolve for BP 1.0 and WSDL 1.2/2.0 while also anticipating 
  the upcoming BP 1.1 (attachments). 
  
In addition, recommend we discuss how this affects interoperability and 
  portability, and whether implementation guidelines would be in order 
  (coordination with implementation subgroup is recommended).
Changes: 
  25 Nov 2003 - new issue

  

  
To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the 
   list (replying to this message should 
  automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as 
  you send it starts "Issue - 86 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a 
  message. 
  
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for 
  new issue submission is the sender of this announcement). 
  
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
  the OASIS TC), go to 
  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
Next in thread → Next in month →