Please look at the example I gave at http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue77. In that example, the abstract message "Header" is not part of the abstract operation "op1" (but is still mapped to the concrete binding of "op1").
Ugo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:46 PM
> To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera
> Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; ;
>
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation
> definitions
>
>
> I'm confused .. can you give an example of what you mean by
> "abstract messages that are not part of an abstract operation"?
> Maybe I haven't understood what you have in mind ..
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ugo Corda" <>
> To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <>;
> "Francisco Curbera"
> <>
> Cc: "Ron Ten-Hove" <>; "Satish Thatte"
> <>; <>;
> <>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:04 AM
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation
> definitions
>
>
> > So are you saying that WSIF can only process a subset of
> all the legal
> (according to WSDL 1.1) WSDL files? (Please notice that I am
> not talking
> about adding any extension at the abstract level - just
> supporting what is
> allowed by WSDL 1.1)
> >
> > Ugo
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:00 PM
> > > To: Ugo Corda; Francisco Curbera
> > > Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Satish Thatte; ;
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation
> > > definitions
> > >
> > >
> > > "Ugo Corda" <> writes:
> > > >
> > > > Just curious: does WSIF allow you to define abstract
> > > messages that are not
> > > part of an abstract operation?
> > > >
> > > > Ugo
> > >
> > > No it doesn't; WSIF only adds additional bindings to WSDL,
> > > not anything
> > > at the abstract level.
> > >
> > > Sanjiva.
> > >
> > >
>
>
