Issue - 62 - Proposal to Vote

I would like to make a minor change to the "mathematical" formulation.
Point 2 is too strict; the English version is ok.

If a serializable scope has an event handler associated with it, no
enclosed scope nor a scope in the body of the event handler can be
serializable. If a non-serializable scope has an event handler associated
with it, an enclosed scope as well as a scope in the body of the event
handler can be serializable.

I hope that's the English equivalent of the following:

Let's assume a scope S, an event handler E associated with S, a scope S-S
that is part of S, and a scope S-E that is part of E. Then the following
rules apply
   1. If S is marked variableAccessSerializable="yes", then neither scope
      S-S nor scope S-E can be marked with variableAccessSerializable
      ="yes".
   2. If scope S is marked variableAccessSerializable="no", scope S-E
       and scope S-S can be marked variableAccessSerializable="yes"

Cheers,

dieter