RE: [ubl] Extension

From
Martin Forsberg
Date
2006-05-30T18:43:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ubl] Extension
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [ubl] Extension

From: "Martin Forsberg" <>

To: "David Kruppke" <>,"Peter Borresen" <>,<>

Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:42:34 +0200

Hi David,

It might be that we are talking about different things here. When I say
a profiled schema I mean a restricted version of a UBL-schema (or a
UBL-model - Restricted perhaps from Gefeg.FX). I want the xml-instances
to be conformant to UBL, but I also want the xml-instances to be
generated from a subset of UBL. The profiled schema must have the same
namespace as UBL. If I use a tool (like yours) to create my profiled
schema based on the UBL-models, wouldn't the NDR-rule create the
Extension[0..1] automatically?

Best regards
Martin