MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Extension
From: "Martin Forsberg" <>
To: "Peter Borresen" <>,<>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:47:14 +0200
Title: Extension
Hi Peter,
Does that mean that the Extension is not part of the model?
If Extension is auto generated to all schemas using the UBL-ndr, will that
effect the subsets and profiles? If a group or industry wants to have a strict
subset without the possibility for extensions, can it be restricted as other
parts of the model?
Best regards,
/Martin
Forsberg
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:]
Sent: den 30 maj 2006 16:13
To:
Cc: David Kruppke;
Subject: [ubl] Extension
Dear TC
I talked to David Kruppke from Gefeg and agreed that
Extension [0..1] is handled as a NDR issue - an element generated from GEFEC FX
in stead being specified in each document.
This is the definition of extension we agreed on at
the Brussel meeting.
ID [0..1] (name type)
Name [0..1] (name
type)
AgencyID [0..1] (ID
type)
AgencyName
[0..1] (Name type)
VersionID [0..1] (ID
type)
AgencyURI [0..1] (ID
type)
URI [0..1] (ID
type)
ExtensionReasonCode [1..1]
(Code type)
ExtensionReason [0..1] (text
type)
ExtensionContentAny [1..1]
(xsd: any)
kind regards
Peter
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
