ubl — archive

RE: [ubl] Extension

From: Martin Forsberg
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:43:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] Extension




From: "Martin Forsberg" <[email protected]>
To: "David Kruppke" <[email protected]>,"Peter Borresen" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:42:34 +0200






Hi David,

It might be that we are talking about different things here. When I say
a profiled schema I mean a restricted version of a UBL-schema (or a
UBL-model - Restricted perhaps from Gefeg.FX). I want the xml-instances
to be conformant to UBL, but I also want the xml-instances to be
generated from a subset of UBL. The profiled schema must have the same
namespace as UBL. If I use a tool (like yours) to create my profiled
schema based on the UBL-models, wouldn't the NDR-rule create the
Extension[0..1] automatically?

Best regards
Martin