ubl — archive

RE: [ubl] Extension

From: Michael Grimley
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:52:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] Extension




From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>
To: Peter Borresen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:51:19 -0400






Title: Extension



Peter,
 
You seem to have an object  ('ID') with an 
apparent property term of 'ID' defined as NameType; is this 
correct?
 
Thank You,
Mike
 



From: Peter Borresen 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 1013
To: 
[email protected]
Cc: David Kruppke; 
[email protected]
Subject: [ubl] Extension



  
  Dear TC 
  I talked to David Kruppke from Gefeg and agreed 
  that Extension [0..1] is handled as a NDR issue - an element generated from 
  GEFEC FX in stead being specified in each document. 
  This is the definition of extension we agreed on at 
  the Brussel meeting. 
  ID [0..1] (name type)  
Name [0..1] (name type)
AgencyID [0..1] (ID 
  type)      
AgencyName 
  [0..1] (Name type)  
VersionID [0..1] (ID 
  type)     
AgencyURI [0..1] (ID 
  type)     
URI [0..1] (ID 
  type)   
ExtensionReasonCode [1..1] 
  (Code type) 
ExtensionReason [0..1] 
  (text type)     
ExtensionContentAny [1..1] (xsd: any)  

kind regards 


  Peter 












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]