xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL

From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:48:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

xacml message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL

From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
To: "Hal Lockhart" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:09:19 -0400

Colleagues,

These were all private communications, based on a private straw
poll by myself of TC members.  While WSPL appears to have strong
support from a majority of TC members, it appears we do not have
the necessary 2/3 majority at this time.  Only one objector was
specific, saying WSPL is outside the scope of XACML and is
inconsistent with WS-Policy.  One early public comment was
received on the list, also claiming WSPL was outside the scope of
XACML.

I am very much in favor of public discussion.  I again request
that objectors post their objections publicly to
[email protected] so that the editor and contributors
can attempt to resolve them.

If the only objection is that WSPL is outside the scope of XACML,
yet members believe it meets the published requirements for a web
services policy language, then perhaps we should start a new
OASIS TC for it.

Anne

On 16 September, Hal Lockhart writes: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
 > From: "Hal Lockhart" <[email protected]>
 > To: "bill parducci" <[email protected]>,
 >    "XACML TC" <[email protected]>
 > Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
 > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:34:31 -0400
 > 
 > I haven't seen anything on the list. I take it these have been private
 > communications. Can this discussion be shared on the list? The new OASIS TC
 > process emphasizes the importance of conducting TC discussions on the list.
 > 
 > Hal
 > 
 > >