xacml — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [xacml] Summary of Discussion about Submitting XACML (and SAML) to the ITU
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->xacml message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Summary of Discussion about Submitting XACML (and SAML) to the ITU
- From: Tim Moses <[email protected]>
- To: "'Hal Lockhart'" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:03:53 -0400
Hal - I have no objection to the proposed course of action. If the timing is suitable, we should advance 1.1. If plans proceed slowly and 2.0 has reached OS status, then we should advance that version. All the best. Tim.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]