ubl — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl] Coments to the Dispositions of Issues list by JPLSC
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->ubl message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Coments to the Dispositions of Issues list by JPLSC
- From: "Yukinori Saito" <[email protected]>
- To: "Tim McGrath" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:23:31 +0900
|
Dear Tim McGrath,
Thank you very much for your reply.
I understand that the situation regarding Code values definitions in UBL
V2.0. Code values definitions in UBL V2.0 are a future job. I
suppose this job is quite a big job.
I agree that UBL had better to adopt the UN/ECE recommendations.
However, in case of UBL's original defined codes, UBL have to define the
code values, or have to provide some guideline to define each code
values.
Best Regards, Yukinori Saito
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
|