ubl — archive

[Tim McGrath]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Coments to the Dispositions of Issues list by JPLSC




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: swebb@gefeg.com
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:38:52 +0800










thanks for reminding me about the new specification.


what i meant was that we don't need the code list values to create UBL
2.0 schemas - which is our current priority.


we will have to provide code values with the UBL 2.0 package.  that
means creating 'genericode' versions of the code lists but these are
independent of the actual UBL schemas.


if anyone wants to know what values will be in the code lists then most
are either already defined in UBL 1.0 or they will be taken from the
UN/ECE recommendations at:


http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec_index.htm



Sylvia Webb wrote:


  
Tim,

Please do not forget that we agreed in the 28 February UBL Pacific call that
the UBL Codelist Methodology is an additional specification
(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200602/msg00115.html).

This means that we need to provide values for codes as we did for UBL 1.0
independent of what is needed for the new Codelist Methodology. Ideally,
these values should be available for the next round of schema generation.

Regards,
Sylvia