Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

From
Jeni Tennison <>
To
Eric van der Vlist <>
Date
2002-10-02T15:33:45Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> By business logic, I guess that Tim meant (or I least I would say
> myself) that W3C XML Schema is often weak and requires at least the
> addition of a rule based schema language like Schematron if not the
> full flexibility and power of XSLT or a general purpose programming
> language...

That's what I assumed as well. *Annotation* of a document (using a
schema and/or other tools) wouldn't require checking at the
business-logic level. *Validation* of a document (using a schema
and/or other tools) would.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/