Eric van der Vlist [mailto:] wrote:
> By business logic, I guess that Tim meant (or I least I would say
> myself) that W3C XML Schema is often weak and requires at least the
> addition of a rule based schema language like Schematron if not the
> full flexibility and power of XSLT or a general purpose programming
> language...
Ok, that makes more sense. Having additional rule/constraint evaluation
built into the language is a huge plus, but it can always be layered
over schema validation. In .NET, you can accomplish this by writing a
custom extension that can be used declaratively on your WS methods.
--
Aaron Skonnard <http://skonnard.com>, DevelopMentor <http://develop.com>
Essential XML Quick Reference available online in PDF format...
<http://develop.com/books>
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their
shoes.
