Re: [xacml] Erratum regarding namespaces

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Erratum regarding namespaces




From: Seth Proctor <>
To: Tim Moses <>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:11:07 -0400








On Jun 20, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Tim Moses wrote:
> Colleagues - It has been pointed out that we have a discrepancy in  
> the definition of namespaces for our XACML v2.0 schemata.  In  
> section B.1 (and elsewhere) the namespaces are defined to be ...

I have a question. Was the change to add ":schema:os" at the end of  
the namespace because of some OASIS convention? I think I remember  
some discussion about this, but now I can't recall it.

Personally, I'd rather see the simpler (section 1.3) namespace, since  
it's clear how this follows from the 1.x specifications. If there's  
an OASIS convention, or a clear use of one form in the 2.0  
specification, however, I don't think that gives us much choice :)


seth