RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many resourceIds in request context?

From
Satoshi Hada <>
Date
2004-01-06T01:59:56+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many resourceIds in request context?
>> It should not be required

I think it should be required to clarify
how to process a hierarchical resource and the "scope" attribute.

Satoshi Hada

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory 

mailto:

"Daniel Engovatov"
<> 

2004/01/06 11:02

To

Satoshi Hada/Japan/IBM@IBMJP,
"XACML" <>

cc

Subject

RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many
resourceIds in request context?

Ouch.  This is bad.  This is real
bad.  I did not notice this sentence.  It should not be required.
  Will think on what interpretation I can suggest instead.

Daniel.

Also, Section 7.8 says that if the "scope" value is "Immediate"

or omitted, the request SHALL be interpreted to apply to 

just the single resource specified by the "resource-id" 

attribute. 

I think this description implies that 

there must be one and only one "resource-id" attribute 

in any request context.