Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13




From: Seth Proctor <>
To: Polar Humenn <>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:15:45 -0500








On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 01:08, Polar Humenn wrote:
> This is the case where you need to specify the attribute in the return
> status as missing. Correct?

Yes.

> As part of the input context, every <Attribute> MUST have a value,
> otherise, the "mustBePresent" semantics breaks down. We should probably
> have a new element that specifies it as a missing attribute specification
> as part of the output context not to get it mixed up with the <Attribute>
> element.
> 
> Is that the way its going?

That is the way this is going. That's what I originally suggested since
we need to keep the behavior that you describe here. I'll try to get this
written up soon.


seth