MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Draft Minutes - November 13
From: Polar Humenn <>
To: Michael McIntosh <>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:08:51 -0500 (EST)
My appologies for not making the concall this morning. Unforunately, I got
detained at the doctor's office this morning.
> Seth: Status Issue - want to be able to specify attribute without value.
> Anne: Already accepted this.
> Hal: Want to have two definitions (one where value is required and one
> where it isn't)
This is the case where you need to specify the attribute in the return
status as missing. Correct?
As part of the input context, every <Attribute> MUST have a value,
otherise, the "mustBePresent" semantics breaks down. We should probably
have a new element that specifies it as a missing attribute specification
as part of the output context not to get it mixed up with the <Attribute>
element.
Is that the way its going?
BTW, I leave for England tomorrow for a week, so I will not be at the next
concall.
Cheers,
-Polar
