MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
From: Polar Humenn <>
To: Anne Anderson <>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:54:34 -0400 (EDT)
My comments,
I don't think the WSPL document is out of the scope of XACML.
It is merely a strict profile of use of XACML for a particular
application. SAML does this all the time, creating profiles, so
that it will work with a particular technology, like web browsers.
I've read the document, and although I don't condone web services as a
viable efficient mechanism for backoffice communications, I don't see
anything wrong with it.
My $2 cents.
Cheers,
-Polar
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Anne Anderson wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> These were all private communications, based on a private straw
> poll by myself of TC members. While WSPL appears to have strong
> support from a majority of TC members, it appears we do not have
> the necessary 2/3 majority at this time. Only one objector was
> specific, saying WSPL is outside the scope of XACML and is
> inconsistent with WS-Policy. One early public comment was
> received on the list, also claiming WSPL was outside the scope of
> XACML.
>
> I am very much in favor of public discussion. I again request
> that objectors post their objections publicly to
> so that the editor and contributors
> can attempt to resolve them.
>
> If the only objection is that WSPL is outside the scope of XACML,
> yet members believe it meets the published requirements for a web
> services policy language, then perhaps we should start a new
> OASIS TC for it.
>
> Anne
>
> On 16 September, Hal Lockhart writes: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
> > From: "Hal Lockhart" <>
> > To: "bill parducci" <>,
> > "XACML TC" <>
> > Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
> > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:34:31 -0400
> >
> > I haven't seen anything on the list. I take it these have been private
> > communications. Can this discussion be shared on the list? The new OASIS TC
> > process emphasizes the importance of conducting TC discussions on the list.
> >
> > Hal
> >
> > >
