Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xacml] Attribute's Issuer as string?

From
Satoshi Hada <>
Date
2003-07-10T05:21:35+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] Attribute's Issuer as string?
Hi,

I've just found another error both in
Version 1.0 and the draft of Version 1.1:

Section 5.27:

<xs:attribute name="Issuer"
       type="xs:anyURI"  use="optional"/>

should be

<xs:attribute name="Issuer"
       type="xs:string"  use="optional"/>

Furthermore, I found the following sentence,
which says that it must be compared by URI equality.

>> If the Issuer attribute is
present in the attribute designator, then it MUST match, by URI equality,
the Issuer of the same attribute.  

Satoshi Hada

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory 

mailto:

Anne Anderson <>

2003/07/10 05:03

Please respond to Anne.Anderson
        

        To:
       Frank Siebenlist <>

        cc:
       XACML TC <>

        Subject:
       Re: [xacml] Attribute's Issuer as string?

       

Frank,

This is an inheritance from SAML, which defines Issuer as a

"string".  Clearly it is a rather primitive concept at this

point, and could use much more elaboration based on actual

implementation environments.  Yours is a good case.

Thanks,

Anne

On 9 July, Frank Siebenlist writes: [xacml] Attribute's Issuer as string?

 > From: Frank Siebenlist <>

 > To: XACML TC <>

 > Subject: [xacml] Attribute's Issuer as string?

 > Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:15:11 -0700

 > 

 > The Attribute's Issuer is defined as a string, and I was wondering
what the 

 > design rational was behind that choice.

 > 

 > I was trying to see how you could take care of part of the path validation
of an 

 > assertion in xacml.

 > 

 > For example, you would only accept a certain attribute value if it
was issued by 

 >    a subject that was a member of a certain group, or only
by an issuer with a 

 > certain name only if that name was asserted by a certain identity
issuer.

 > 

 > I guess I was looking for an issuer type that would again be a subject
with its 

 > own attributes.

 > 

 > One alternative would be to chain different subjects in the Request
together 

 > through a naming conventions that ties issuer's value to a subject's
attribute 

 > value ... but that doesn't seem very elegant.

 > 

 > Insight? Suggestions?

 > 

 > Thanks, Frank.

 > 

 > 

 > -- 

 > Frank Siebenlist              

 > The Globus Project - Argonne National Laboratory

 > 

 > 

 > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php

-- 

Anne H. Anderson             Email: 

Sun Microsystems Laboratories

1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928

Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692

You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php
Next in thread → Next in month →