Re: [wsrm] New issue - namespace

RFC3121 [1] describes the OASIS URN namespace, with examples. In terms
of format, here's an example from the OASIS/ebXML Registry TC - we use a
URN format rather than a URL format:

urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:rim:xsd:3.0

I believe there is an "official"

So ours could be:

urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrm:XXXX:xsd:1.1

Where XXXX is some distinguishing identifier for the particular schema,
and 1.1 (or 2.0) is the version. 

In terms of distinguishing identifier, in the Registry TC we have:

rim = Registry Information Model
rs  = Registry Services
(these are our 2 specifications)
lcm = Life Cycle Manager
query = Query Manager
(these are our 2 interfaces)

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

[1] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3121.html

iwasa wrote:
> 
> Here is a new issue:
>   - Namespace should be changed to OASIS namespace.
> 
> Proposed Resolution:
>   We use OASIS namespace for the spec.
>   A proposed format would be:
>   http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/(TC name)/schema/ws-r-(version).xsd
> 
> Does anyone know what should be in (TC name) ?
> We should be able to put the schema at the location.
> 
> And the version number is other issue to discuss.
> I think we have two choices for version number
> as follows:
>     - Ver1.1
>     - Ver2.0
> I slightly prefer Ver1.1. Any comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Iwasa
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrm/members/leave_workgroup.php