RE: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthandfor WS-ResourceProperties

Yes, that was the intent of the suggestion.

Regards,

Ian Robinson

STSM, WebSphere Transactions Architect

IBM Hursley Lab, UK



"Latha Srinivasan" <>

24/06/2004 12:59

Please respond to Latha.Srinivasan

        

        To:        "'Steve Graham'" <>, Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB

        cc:        <>

        Subject:        RE: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties

+1

 

 

From: Steve Graham [mailto:] 

Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:53 AM

To: Ian Robinson

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties

shall we extend this to wsrf-rl (resource lifetime) wsrf-bf (base faults) and wsrf-sg (service groups)? 

++++++++

Steve Graham

(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)

STSM, On Demand Architecture

Member, IBM Academy of Technology

<Soli Deo Gloria/>

++++++++

Ian Robinson <> 

06/24/2004 06:54 AM 
        

        To:         

        cc:         

        Subject:        [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties

Special request from the Web Service for Remote Portlets TC, who have a prior claim to "WSRP" as an acronym. 

We could consider changing all our namespace prefixes to wsrf-rp, wsrf-rl etc and including "WSRF-RP" etc as the abbreviated form of the specification name in the introductions of each spec to start to train people not to say "WSRP" when they mean "WS-ResourceProperties". 

Regards,

Ian