Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties
Even though it may be non-normative, it is always good to avoid generating
confusion when one can.
Toby Considine
oBIX
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Maguire [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:41 AM
To: Ian Robinson
Cc:
Subject: Re: [wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of "wsrp" for namespace prefix of
shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties
I do not understand this request; the namespace prefix is non-normative in
the specifications and anyone can and will change it to whatever they need.
Are we trying to standardize prefixes?
Tom
T o m M a g u i r e
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
internet:
phone: 845.433.9401
Ian Robinson
<ian_robinson@uk.
ibm.com> To
06/24/2004 06:54 cc
AM
Subject
[wsrf] New issue: Avoid use of
"wsrp" for namespace prefix of
shorthand for WS-ResourceProperties
Special request from the Web Service for Remote Portlets TC, who have a
prior claim to "WSRP" as an acronym.
We could consider changing all our namespace prefixes to wsrf-rp, wsrf-rl
etc and including "WSRF-RP" etc as the abbreviated form of the specification
name in the introductions of each spec to start to train people not to say
"WSRP" when they mean "WS-ResourceProperties".
Regards,
Ian
Next in thread →
Next in month →