Friendly amendment: and clean up any current language in 11.3 that contradicts this.
________________________________
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:]
Sent: Wed 5/4/2005 8:18 AM
To: wsbpeltc; Alex Yiu
Cc: Satish Thatte
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 180 - Proposal to Vote
Hi,
It looks like my suggestions are accepted by a bunch of people.
Here I formally submit the propsal to vote:
Actual Text Changes Suggestion:
In Section 11.3, add the following to the end of the paragraph which
starts with "Note that a WSDL fault is identified ... "
-------------------------------------
Even though a fault in WS-BPEL is just identified by the fault name, it
does NOT enforce that faults of a particular fault name can be
associated with one fault message type. On the contrary, faults of a
particular fault name can be associated with multiple message types and
the <catch> construct in WS-BPEL facilitates differentiation of faults
with different (message) types of the same fault name.
-------------------------------------
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
