Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 180 - Proposal to Vote

Hi,

It looks like my suggestions are accepted by a bunch of people.

Here I formally submit the propsal to vote:
Actual Text Changes Suggestion:

In Section 11.3, add the following to the end of the paragraph which 
starts with "Note that a WSDL fault is identified ... "

-------------------------------------
Even though a fault in WS-BPEL is just identified by the fault name,  it 
does NOT enforce that faults of a particular fault name can be 
associated with one fault message type. On the contrary, faults of a 
particular fault name can be associated with multiple message types and 
the <catch> construct in WS-BPEL facilitates differentiation of  faults 
with different (message) types of the same fault name.
-------------------------------------


Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu