Re: [ubl] 3th public review

At the risk of being controversial (as usual :-(  ) I'd question whether
point three is in line with OASIS rules about openness :-) - just read
the OASIS copyright on the schema files. And point four seems to
be contrary to process but that seems more debatable to me. Point one
seems contrary to the rules about an SC too (it can only recommend, not
decide on the TC's behalf).

All the best

Steve

>>> "Peter Borresen"