Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

ubl message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)

From: Tim McGrath <>

To: 

Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:46:54 +0800

your comment is clear in that you obviously see a disconnect but i am not
sure how to deal with this without tangible examples...

for example:

* what do you mean by 'the library of CCs'?  - i am not aware there are any.
 

* what do you mean by 'consistency in the use of qualifiers vs. multi-worded
object classes and property terms'?  - i thought we had introduced property
term possessive nouns and nouns to try and deal with this more formally than
the CCTS itself.

 wrote:

  
  
  
   
  
 
  
Tim,

 
  
 

 
  
the comments  appear pretty clear to me.  You did not base
the library on CCs - hence the  BIEs are a hodgepodge of objects with no
real relationships that are fully  harmonizable.  The library has no consistency
in the use of qualifiers vs  multi worded object classes and property terms
hence the relationships are  unclear at best.  

 
  
 

 
  
Mark