MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Review of Two Diffs (Michael/Sue's and Stephen's)
From: Tim McGrath <>
To:
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:56:48 +0800
You have made this statement before but I have not seen examples of what
you mean by this. Perhaps you could explain where we have gone wrong and
what we should be doing using UBL1.1 BIEs? It is hard to correct something
if we don't know what we are aiming for.
wrote:
One of the fundamental problems with the library is the
Lack of consistently applied object qualifiers. This makes any harmonization
extremely difficult if not impossible, and leads to a questionable conformance
to ccts. The use of property terms and qualifiers is equally problematic
in the way we have done it. Until and unless we begin to base our Bies on
CCs we will have a disconnected inconsistant library that manifests itself
in the form of inconsistent schema.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7481
Wireless (703) 655-4810
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"
