Neal,
This is very valuable feedback. Some of the errors are fixed in the current
schema (now accessible over the web see RS 1.0.8). However, quite a few were yet
undetected.
"Smith, Neal L. (NLSM)" wrote:
> Here is the first of two comment documents.
>
> Comparing the latest RIM 1.12 vs. the latest rim.xsd, there are quite a few
> (mostly minor) differences. Most could be fixed by changing either the RIM
> spec or the schema (and I don't know which is correct).
> <<Proposed ChangesRIM-NLSM1.doc>>
>
> Neal Smith
> ChevronTexaco
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [SMTP:]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:03 AM
> > To:
> > Subject: [regrep] RIM V1.12 for review
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Here is the updated RIM for you to review. Please get your comments back
> > to
> > me by Thursday afternoon. I'm attaching the form to use for comments.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Sally
> >
> > <<RIM V 1.12 DRAFT.pdf>> <<Proposed Changes.doc>> << File: RIM V 1.12
> > DRAFT.pdf >> << File: Proposed Changes.doc >>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: Proposed ChangesRIM-NLSM1.doc
> Proposed ChangesRIM-NLSM1.doc Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
> Encoding: BASE64
--
Regards,
Farrukh
