Eric,
I'm not completely following what you are
saying here? Why should we be eliminating committee debate and
"streamlining" votes?
Having just one company - one vote - is
likely to mean that companies invest LESS effort in committees - and
surely that is a bad thing? Also bad is the notion that company
staff cannot freely work out differences in the TC process - or
participate openly - for me that is the essense of what OASIS is - not
fettered by company mandates - but open peer review.
I'd hate to see the situation where we are
institutionalizing companies working behind closed doors to determine
their own position(s) and then bringing that to the TC. Much
better that the TC foster open debate.
OASIS is supposed to be a public process that
maximizes participation - how is what you are saying in alignment
with that?
Thanks, DW
-------- Original Message
--------
Subject: [oasis-member-discuss] FW: Possible change to TC
voting rules
- input requested
From: "Newcomer, Eric"
<>
Date: Fri, October 27, 2006 3:53
pm
To: <>
I
think a one company one vote rule would be an improvement. It
would
help eliminate some amount of committee debate (especially
among
representatives of the same company) and help streamline
votes.
Eric
+1 781 902 8366
fax: +1 781 902
8009
blog: http://blogs.iona.com/newcomer
Making Software Work
Together (TM)
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 6:57 PM
To: Newcomer,
Eric
Subject: Possible change to TC voting rules - input
requested
Dear IONA Technologies* Primary Contact
Please look at the following message about a possible change to
TC
voting
rules:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/oasis-member-discuss/
email/archives/200610/msg00000.html
and if you are so inclined please respond as requested to
oasis-
thanks,
jeff
--
Jeff
Mischkinsky
Director, Web Services
Standards
+1(650)506-1975
Consulting Member Technical Staff
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S
4OP9
Oracle
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
