RESOLVED: [emergency] Issues with EDXL-HAVE Committee Specification XSD

Thanks to Alessandro and Ram for pointing me to the right place in the xPIL schema - this is already defined on the ref="{name}".

 

Generator was missing that method of adding constraints.

 

All clear on this one - not an issue any more.

 

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [emergency] Issues with EDXL-HAVE Committee Specification XSD
From: "David RR Webber \(XML\)" <>
Date: Fri, May 16, 2008 8:27 pm
To: 

Elysa,

 

Attached PDF.

 

Having reviewed this and generated latest (R5) into CAM template - and started working with the new Want List exclude() features in CAM - I hit on this - that I'd previously missed.

 

Clearly right now - we're forcing people to provide all the items marked in red.

 

This is not consistent with our approach in the main structure.

 

And it will be a significant burden on message design and implementation.

 

We can quickly solve this easily be making these items marked - as optional.

 

I'd like to propose we update the XSD accordingly.

 

Thanks, DW

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php