← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: Notes from the October 21, 2003 GIS SC teleconference

From
Carl Reed <>
Date
2003-10-22T17:43:07+00:00
ID
000201c398c4$94abb9c0$ded6fea9@CarlReed
Thread
RE: Notes from the October 21, 2003 GIS SC teleconference
Notes from the October 21, 2003 GIS SC 
teleconference

 

In attendance: Carl Reed, Jeff Booth (Michael 
Baker/FEMA), Gary Hamm, Tom M, Rex Brookes

 

1. Carl notified the group that he would not be 
able to attend/chair the November 11th 2003 teleconference. He will be overseas. 
However, the group agreed, that if necessary, they would hold the teleconference 
anyway.

 

2. Jeff Booth provided an excellent summary of the 
history of the US Government work on EM Symbology. Following is my synopsis. I 
am sure I missed some items, so I apologize in advance.

 

A couple of years ago, Scott McAfee (FEMA) asked 
Michael Baker to review what symbology was available and has been used for use 
by first responders and the emergency services community. This work 
provided the background for the Kent State study, which members of the EM TC 
should be aware of. This work lead to collaboration of FEMA (as a member) with 
the FGDC to form a Homeland Security WG of the FGDC. A primary focus of this WG 
is defining a set of EM symbologies (art work) for the first responder and ES 
community. A number of other interested parties, including NSGIC, Bill Burgess 
(New Jersey(, Census, NIMA, DTRA, and Energy, have been involved in the FGDC 
effort. This group reviewed different symbology sets and specifications. They 
decided to bound the assessment so that only point features were considered. 
They also bounded the analysis based on some data models/specifications (HIFLD, 
e.g.). They iterated a set of symbols based on requirements for the larger 
community. The WG then contracted with U of Maryland to do the art work. 
Overall, the majority of the work has been voluntary. Once the work is completed 
and the results reviewed, may submit to ANSI. Yesterday, the symbology set was 
made available to the State of Maryland (80 some organizations in the State) for 
a 10 day evaluation. Los Angeles EM Services is also doing a 10 day 
evaluation.

 

3. Carl has an outstanding action WRT to liaison 
activities with the OGC. Carl initiated the dialogue today.

 

4. Rex spent a few minutes has requirements for a 
demonstration portal and asked if any of the EM symbols could be made available 
for this demonstration. That conversation was taken off line

 

Submitted

 

Carl Reed
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →