Re: placement of timing/security parameters

Cory,

Yes, these should be removed in that they are redundant and  were a cut an paste
error on my part.

Cory Casanave wrote:

> Please verify that the following, which are currently in "Abstract
> Attribute" have gone away;
>
> isSecureEntity
>
> isSignatureEntity
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karsten Riemer [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:23 PM
> > To:   [email protected]
> > Cc:   [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject:      placement of timing/security parameters
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> > Before Cory finalizes the model and DTD, please verify that this is the
> > correct distribution of timing/security parameters on the various classes:
> >
> >
> > BinaryCollaboration:
> > timeToPerform
> >
> > BusinessTransactionActivity:
> > timeToPerform
> > isConcurrent
> >
> > BusinessTransaction:
> > isSecureTransportRequired
> > isReliableTransportRequired
> >
> > RequestingBusinessActivity:
> > IsAuthorizationRequired
> > IsNonRepudiationRequired
> > TimeToPerform
> > TimeToAcknowledgeAcceptance
> > TimeToAcknowledgeReceipt
> > isNonRepudiationOfReceiptRequired
> >
> >
> > RespondingBusinessActivity:
> > isIntelligibleCheckRequired
> >
> > InformationEntity:
> > isConfidential
> > isTamperProof
> > isAuthenticated
> >
> >
> > Jim, this conforms with the diagram you sent me, but please confirm
> > anyway,
> >
> > thanks,
> > -karsten

begin:vcard 
n:Clark;James
tel;cell:936.524.4424
tel;work:936.264.3366
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:I.C.O.T.
adr:;;10987 Quinlan N Lake;Conroe;TX;77303;
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Principal Consultant
fn:James Clark
end:vcard