RE: placement of timing/security parameters

From
Cory Casanave <>
To
Karsten Riemer <>,
Date
2001-01-03T23:28:46Z
ID
<40C6A0622380D31188C30000E85123F55F4794@EMAILER>
Thread
RE: placement of timing/security parameters
Please verify that the following, which are currently in "Abstract
Attribute" have gone away;

isSecureEntity

isSignatureEntity

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Karsten Riemer [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 02, 2001 4:23 PM
> To:	[email protected]
> Cc:	[email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject:	placement of timing/security parameters
> 
> Hi Jim,
> Before Cory finalizes the model and DTD, please verify that this is the
> correct distribution of timing/security parameters on the various classes:
> 
> 
> BinaryCollaboration:
> timeToPerform
> 
> BusinessTransactionActivity:
> timeToPerform
> isConcurrent
> 
> BusinessTransaction:
> isSecureTransportRequired
> isReliableTransportRequired
> 
> RequestingBusinessActivity:
> IsAuthorizationRequired
> IsNonRepudiationRequired
> TimeToPerform
> TimeToAcknowledgeAcceptance
> TimeToAcknowledgeReceipt
> isNonRepudiationOfReceiptRequired
> 
> 
> RespondingBusinessActivity:
> isIntelligibleCheckRequired
> 
> InformationEntity:
> isConfidential
> isTamperProof
> isAuthenticated
> 
> 
> Jim, this conforms with the diagram you sent me, but please confirm
> anyway,
> 
> thanks,
> -karsten