Re: [docbook] Add "danger" to the list of possible admonitions?

From
Peter Flynn <>
Date
2016-04-28T19:56:23+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [docbook] Add "danger" to the list of possible admonitions?
On 04/28/2016 09:24 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> What is danger to you might be nothing to me?
> I think caution is right or a good compromise. 

I was never clear why a caution was worse than a warning.

<para><command>drop lamp</command></para>
<caution role="fatal">
  <para>It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.</para>
</caution>

On 04/28/2016 09:15 AM, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> The element danger would also fit better
> to the ANSI standard (I think it was Z535, right?).

If there is a need to match with an existing standard/hierarchy/ontology
I'd rather see it done in an enumerated attribute than an element type.

///Peter