For the curious, here's what the DITA 1.3 specification allows for the @type attribute on <note> (second subsection on this page):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/attributes/thetypeattribute.html
The value "other" allows extensibility in conjunction with another attribute @othertype:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/note.html
mag
--
Tom Magliery
JustSystems Canada, Inc.
Co-secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
DITA 1.3 Specification: http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part0-overview.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Flynn [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:56 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [docbook] Add "danger" to the list of possible admonitions?
On 04/28/2016 09:24 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
> What is danger to you might be nothing to me?
> I think caution is right or a good compromise.
I was never clear why a caution was worse than a warning.
<para><command>drop lamp</command></para>
<caution role="fatal">
<para>It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.</para>
</caution>
On 04/28/2016 09:15 AM, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> The element danger would also fit better
> to the ANSI standard (I think it was Z535, right?).
If there is a need to match with an existing standard/hierarchy/ontology
I'd rather see it done in an enumerated attribute than an element type.
///Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
