I can rearrange my schedule to show up at any point. I'm assuming the
meeting will not be too long, since it is primarily just to go through the
vote.
Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit
Eliot Kimber <> wrote on 10/05/2010 03:48:38 PM:
> From: Eliot Kimber <>
> To: "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <>, dita
> <>
> Date: 10/05/2010 03:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [dita] DITA TC meeting tomorrow (Wednesday)?
>
> I am free between 10 and noon CDT and after 1:30 CDT.
>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
>
> On 10/5/10 2:22 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <> wrote:
>
> > Kris,
> >
> > It seems plain that this is what we need to do.
> >
> > If we need a meeting in order to rescind the 15-day review and make the
> > request for a ballot, I can shift anything in my schedule
tomorrowexcept one
> > meeting 4-5pm ET, and another 7-9pm ET. The resolution for a 15-
> day review was
> > in the 9/28 meeting.
> >
> > /B
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Mary McRae [mailto:]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:56 PM
> >> Cc: Michael Priestley; ; Don Day (LbW)
> >> Subject:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Kris,
> >>
> >>
> >> The only other thing you need to have before we can start the
> CS ballot is
> >> the 3 statements of use. If you can garner those in the next few
hours (I
> >> doubt there should be any problem other than people reading their
email)
> >> then
> >> yes, your schedule works.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just keep me posted so I can be on high alert :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Mary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Obviously, I made a finger fumble and typed November in the second
list
> >>> item; it should be ³Thursday, 7 October 2010 Wednesday 13
> October 2010.²
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Kris
> >>>
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:54 PM
> >>> To: Mary McRae; Michael Priestley
> >>> Cc: ; Don Day (LbW)
> >>> Subject: RE: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we
> can send the
> >>> DITA 1.2 spec to OASIS for a vote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mary, if we want to withdraw our request for a 15-day review and
proceed
> >>> with a CS approval and OS submission ballot, what would that
entail? Is
> >>> the
> >>> following an accurate lists of necessary steps, and would you
> be available
> >>> to help us meet those milestones?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · We rescind our motion for a 15-day review; request that
OASIS
> >>> sets
> >>> up a ballot for us to approve a committee specification and submit
the
> >>> committee specification to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS
standard.
> >>> (We
> >>> could set up an emergency meeting for tomorrow, Wednesday, 6 October
to
> >>> accomplish this, if necessary.)
> >>>
> >>> · You expedite our request and set up the ballot to run
> Thursday, 7
> >>> November 2010 Wednesday 13 November 2010.
> >>>
> >>> · We have two days to get all supporting materials to
> you; you work
> >>> with us to ensure that the submission is complete.
> >>>
> >>> · DITA 1.2 submitted to OASIS on November 1, for vote
November
> >>> 16-31.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Kris
> >>>
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: Mary McRae [mailto:]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:50 PM
> >>> To: Michael Priestley
> >>> Cc: ; Don Day (LbW); Kristen Eberlein
> >>> Subject: Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we
> can send the
> >>> DITA 1.2 spec to OASIS for a vote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michael,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Package acceptance is one of the rules. All specifications
> must conform to
> >>> those rules, again, ensuring all OASIS specifications are uniform in
> >>> appearance and contain the required content. I am sorry that the new
DITA
> >>> toolkit processing prepared by the TC did not include the proper
notices
> >>> statement, but this cannot be taken as a fault of OASIS staff. I
think a
> >>> four-and-a-half day turnaround (including a weekend) to move an
entire
> >>> office, including a network, and get the new T1 connections up and
running
> >>> was almost as good as we could have possibly hoped for. We are just
at the
> >>> seven day mark with regard to the submission for a 15 day
publicreview and
> >>> that includes a reprocessing on the part of the TC.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I sincerely appreciate the desire of the TC to move this as quickly
as
> >>> possible, and we will do everything within our power, and our
> rules, to help
> >>> you meet your goals. Unfortunately, that does not mean
> disregarding those
> >>> rules.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am still hoping to get the public review announced today,
> although time
> >>> is now running short. If the TC wishes to withdraw that requestand
feels
> >>> that there were no substantive changes made and is instead
> ready to proceed
> >>> with CS approval and OS submission ballot, please let me know asap.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All the best,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mary P McRae
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Director, Standards Development
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Technical Committee Administrator
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Member Section Administrator
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> email:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> phone: 1.603.232.9090
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Michael Priestley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mary,
> >>>
> >>>>> We have rules to ensure that each and every Technical Committee
follows
> >>>> the same process and there is no favoritism. "Bending" the
> rules in effect
> >>>> breaks them and renders them useless.
> >>>
> >>> I can appreciate this, but it sucks when our spec is pushed outto
another
> >>> year (!) because of OASIS problems with servers and package
acceptance. I
> >>> feel like our TC is being penalized for OASIS process and technology
> >>> problems.
> >>>
> >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
> >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect
> >>>
> >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25>
> >>>
> >>> From:
> >>> Mary McRae <>
> >>>
> >>> To:
> >>> Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> >>>
> >>> Cc:
> >>> , "Don Day (LbW)"
> <>,
> >>> Kristen Eberlein <>
> >>>
> >>> Date:
> >>> 10/05/2010 12:52 PM
> >>>
> >>> Subject:
> >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the
DITA
> >>> 1.2
> >>> spec to OASIS for a vote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michael,
> >>>
> >>> Answers inline.
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Michael Priestley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mary,
> >>>
> >>> We missed the deadline by only a few days, which is really
unfortunate
> >>> since
> >>> it pushes us over a full month.
> >>>
> >>> There are still additional ballots to be held before the submission
can
> >>> take
> >>> place. Post review, two ballots (which can run concurrently):
approval as
> >>> CS, and agreement to submit for OS ballot. Those are both 7 day
> ballots and
> >>> again, like most TC Admin requests, have an SLA of 7 days. We shoot
for
> >>> less, but that needs to be built into your timetable.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any room for expediting any of the following:
> >>>
> >>> - the current 15-day public review - is it really required?
> >>> That's up to the TC. The rule is that if substantive changes are
made, an
> >>> additional 15-day review is required. If no further review is
> required the
> >>> TC can agree that no substantive changes were made and request the
CS/OS
> >>> ballots to be initiated. Depending on when the next TC meeting
> is that may
> >>> still not be completed in time for a 15 Oct deadline. Don't
> forget you also
> >>> need your statements of use.
> >>>
> >>> - the submission for voting - does it need to wait till Nov
> 15th, or could
> >>> it be submitted earlier, per the new process?
> >>> to follow the new process you would need to instead have the 60-day
> >>> Candidate OASIS Standard review.
> >>>
> >>> - the 15-day familiarization period - is that absolutely
> required, or could
> >>> it be waived, per the new process?
> >>> see above.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I urge everyone to read the new TC Process. It's an either/or -
current
> >>> section 3.4 or new section 3.4. New section 3.4 includes
> statements of use
> >>> explicitly referring to the Committee Specification, a 60-day
review, and
> >>> further confirmation before proceeding with OS ballot.
> >>>
> >>> We have rules to ensure that each and every Technical Committee
> follows the
> >>> same process and there is no favoritism. "Bending" the rules in
effect
> >>> breaks them and renders them useless.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any of those options would get us back into a November timeframe for
the
> >>> vote.
> >>>
> >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
> >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25>
> >>>
> >>> From:
> >>> Mary McRae <
<mailto:
> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> To:
> >>> Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> >>>
> >>> Cc:
> >>> <mailto:> , "Don
Day
> >>> (LbW)" <
<mailto:> >,
> >>> Kristen Eberlein < <mailto:> >
> >>>
> >>> Date:
> >>> 10/05/2010 11:52 AM
> >>>
> >>> Subject:
> >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the
DITA
> >>> 1.2
> >>> spec to OASIS for a vote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michael,
> >>>
> >>> You would need to submit by 15 Oct for a November vote; that
> can't happen
> >>> since you'll still be out for public review. I agree and typically
advise
> >>> against December votes, however WebCGM has done it and passed so we
know
> >>> it's possible, and certainly DITA has a much larger following
> than WebCGM.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Michael Priestley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mary,
> >>>
> >>> I think we're really looking for a standard in 2010. My one
> concern is that
> >>> a December vote would be hard to get numbers for.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way to move up the process to allow a vote in November?
> >>>
> >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
> >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25>
> >>>
> >>> From:
> >>> Mary McRae <
<mailto:
> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> To:
> >>> Kristen Eberlein < <mailto:> >
> >>>
> >>> Cc:
> >>> "Don Day (LbW)" <
> >>> <mailto:> >, <
> >>> <mailto:> >
> >>>
> >>> Date:
> >>> 10/05/2010 11:18 AM
> >>>
> >>> Subject:
> >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the
DITA
> >>> 1.2
> >>> spec to OASIS for a vote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Kris, for drawing everyone's attention to the process
> changes about
> >>> to take place. I think the TC is well within the timeline to
> get to ballot
> >>> in Dec or Jan under the old rules unless another round of changes is
> >>> anticipated after the public review that is about to be announced.
> >>>
> >>> The one point to consider if it's delayed beyond that is that
another 60
> >>> day
> >>> public review will be required at the new Candidate OASIS Standard
stage.
> >>>
> >>> I am planning to come to each TC meeting for a quick review of
> the changes
> >>> and to answer any questions and will be sending a message later
> in the week
> >>> requesting a 15-min time slot.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Don and the rest of the DITA TC.
> >>>
> >>> I have an additional item that I think should move to the front of
the
> >>> agenda for today¹s meeting. It concerns changes in TC rules and when
we
> >>> anticipate being able to get the DITA 1.2 spec out for an OASIS
vote. (I
> >>> also think that we need to work on the items that must be
> submitted to Mary
> >>> at the same time as the request for an OASIS vote; see items
> highlighted in
> >>> red below.)
> >>>
> >>> Will we potentially be able to send the DITA 1.2 spec out for a vote
in
> >>> 2010, or will it need to happen in 2011?
> >>>
> >>> Under the old rules, the following conditions apply, which
> would mean that
> >>> the earliest an OASIS vote could occur is December 16-31.
> >>>
> >>> · The DITA TC can approve a committee specification no
> sooner than
> >>> seven days after a public review ends. The vote is by ballot that
OASIS
> >>> administration sets up. The TC can simultaneously request to submit
the
> >>> Committee Specification to the Membership of OASIS for
> consideration as an
> >>> OASIS Standard.
> >>> · Upon resolution of the TC to submit the specification for
> >>> consideration as an OASIS standard, the TC submits the following
items
> >>> (copied verbatim) to the TC Administrator:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (a) Links to the approved Committee Specification in the
TC¹s
> >>> document repository, and any appropriate supplemental
> documentation for the
> >>> specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS
> templates. The
> >>> specification may not have been changed between its approval as
> a Committee
> >>> Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration as an
OASIS
> >>> Standard, except for the changes on the title page and running
> footer noting
> >>> the approval status and date.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (b) The editable version of all files that are part of the
> >>> Committee Specification;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (c) Certification by the TC that all schema and XML
instances
> >>> included in the specification, whether by inclusion or
> reference, including
> >>> fragments of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are
valid;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (d) A clear English-language summary of the
specification;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (e) A statement regarding the relationship of this
> specification
> >>> to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing
> >>> organizations;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (f) The Statements of Use presented above;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (g) The beginning and ending dates of the public review
(s), a
> >>> pointer to the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer
to an
> >>> account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public
review
> >>> period(s), along with its resolution;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (h) An account of and results of the voting to approve the
> >>> specification as a Committee Specification, including the date of
the
> >>> ballot
> >>> and a pointer to the ballot;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (i) An account of or pointer to votes and comments
received in
> >>> any
> >>> earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same
specification,
> >>> together with the originating TC¹s response to each comment;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (j) A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for
the
> >>> originating TC;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · (k) A pointer to any minority reports delivered by one or
more
> >>> Members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee
> Specification,
> >>> which report may include statements regarding why the member
> voted against
> >>> the specification or that the member believes that Substantive
> Changes were
> >>> made which have not gone through public review; or certification by
the
> >>> Chair that no minority reports exist.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · The above submission must be made by the 15th of any
> month to the
> >>> TC Administrator, who shall have until the end of the month to
complete
> >>> administrative processing and checking for completeness and
> correctness of
> >>> the submission. If the submission is incomplete it shall be rejected
but
> >>> may
> >>> be resubmitted at a later time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · The TC Administrator shall submit the proposal to the
OASIS
> >>> Membership by the first day of the following month. The first 15
days of
> >>> that month shall be used by the membership to familiarize themselves
with
> >>> the submission. Voting shall start on the 16th of the month. The
voting
> >>> representatives of those OASIS Organizational Members who were
members at
> >>> the beginning of the familiarization period are eligible to
> vote, and must
> >>> cast their ballots by the end of the month.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The new rules introduce the following changes (as well as others):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · There is no longer a fixed timeline requiring submissions
to be
> >>> made by the 15th of the month; submissions may be made at any time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> · No familiarization period is required prior to a vote by
OASIS
> >>> membership.
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Kris
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>> From: Don Day (LbW) [mailto:
> >>> <mailto:> ]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 8:48 AM
> >>> To: <mailto:> ;
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> Cc: <mailto:>;
Kristen
> >>> Eberlein
> >>> Subject: Re: [dita] When will the 15-day review be announced
> >>>
> >>> Hi. I'm bumping this request in hopes that I can provide the DITA TC
with
> >>> an
> >>> outlook at our meeting coming up later this morning. Given that the
> >>> requested changes were timely effected due to prioritized
> turnaround on our
> >>> end, I thought it would be considerate to get a sooner response.
> >>> --
> >>> Don Day
> >>> Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
> >>>
> >>> On 9/30/2010 1:33 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:
> >>> Hi, Mary and Kim.
> >>>
> >>> When will the 15-day review be announced?
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Kris
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>> From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:
<mailto:
> >
> >>> ]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:05 AM
> >>> To: Kim Goolsby; Mary McRae
> >>> Cc: <mailto:>
> >>> Subject: RE: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin
> >>> Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2
> >>>
> >>> Many thanks, Kim!
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Kris
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>> From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:
> >>> <mailto:> ]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:26 AM
> >>> To: Mary McRae
> >>> Cc: Kristen Eberlein;
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> Subject: Re: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin
> >>> Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'll upload the spec this morning. I am so glad this is resolved!
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Kim
> >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Mary McRae
<>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> (one more time, sorry)
> >>>
> >>> And my apologies to Kim for trying to answer too many questions
> at once and
> >>> not paying close attention to the matter at hand.
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mary McRae
<>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> Hi Kristen,
> >>>
> >>> Yes, that's fine since you have the separate change log; while the
blank
> >>> page isn't perfect, it doesn't harm or detract in any way.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mary
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Kim.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Since the ³Revision history² was indicated as optional in
the
> >>> OASIS template, we decided to omit it from our committee
drafts.Therefore
> >>> we do not want to reintroduce it at this point.
> >>> 2. I can delete page 1237 from the PDF output. However, all
the
> >>> pages
> >>> will continue to be marked with ³Page x of 1237.² I think retaining
the
> >>> blank page is better.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts? I very much appreciate your help with this matter.
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Kris
> >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l
SDL
> >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l
> >>> <mailto:>
> >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/>
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>>
> >>> From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:
> >>> <mailto:> ]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:42 PM
> >>> To: <mailto:>
> >>> Cc: mary.mcrae
> >>> Subject: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin
> Information
> >>> Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2
> >>>
> >>> TCADMIN-243 <http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-243>
> >>>
> >>> Please make the following change:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Please add a 'Revision History' appendix to this document.
> >>> 2. Looking at the pdf, there is an empty page 1237 at the end of the
> >>> document. I suggest removing this.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> Kim
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kim Goolsby
> >>> Publications Specialist
> >>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
> >>> email: <mailto:>
> >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org/>
> >>> phone: 1.734.223.6890
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mary P McRae
> >>> OASIS
> >>> Director, Standards Development
> >>> TC Administrator
> >>> Member Section Administrator
> >>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> >>> email:
> >>> phone: 603.232.9090
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kim Goolsby
> >>> Publications Specialist
> >>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
> >>> email: <mailto:>
> >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org/>
> >>> phone: 1.734.223.6890
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Eliot Kimber
> Senior Solutions Architect
> "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
> Main: 512.554.9368
> www.reallysi.com
> www.rsuitecms.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
