[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Groups - XACML v3.0 Related and Nested Entities Profile Version 1.0 uploaded
|
Hi Steven, Thanks for the work on this. It looks to me to solve the issues it is designed to solve. Here are a few small comments: - Did you intend the whole introduction section to be normative? I guess it's ok as it is, but one could perhaps split of some of the exposition into a non-normative section so that this material does not clutter the normative content with potential ambiguities or mistakes. - I think it should say that the schema fragments in the document are non-normative. Word can easily auto-suggest and break technical content in the document and we don't want to specify the same thing twice (once in the fragment and once in the full schema) - In section 2, in the first paragraph after the QuantifiedExpressionType schema fragment, it says that the domain evaluates to a bag of a "primitive data-type". Shouldn't this be "atomic data-type"? I read primitive data type to mean a non-entity data type, but what I believe you mean is that the value must not be a bag. - I think the schema file should be split out from the word document. Word can easily auto-suggest and break technical content and it is more convenient for implementers and others to have an official schema file to use directly. - Are there any concerns to worry about when we define additional content into the existing XACML 3.0 namespace and schema? I am not well enough knowledgeable in XML schema best practices, so I am just asking. ;-) Best regards, Erik On 2013-10-22 08:17, Steven Legg wrote:
Submitter's message |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]