[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes for 27 January 2011 TC Meeting
Time: 13:00 EDT
Tel: 513-241-0892 Access Code: 65998
Minutes for 27 January 2011 TC Meeting
(from Bill thru multi-decision, from Rich for remainder):
I. Roll Call
Voting Members
Hal Lockhart (Chair)
Bill Parducci (Co-Chair, minutes)
Rich Levinson (minutes)
Erik Rissanen
Paul Tyson
Doron Grinstein
Non-voting Members
Gregory Neven
Franz-Stefan Preiss
David Chadwick Individual Group Member
Jan Herrmann Individual Group Member
Anthony Nadalin Microsoft Corporation Group Member
David Choy EMC Corporation Group Member
Quorum met: (54% per Kavi)
II. Administrivia
Approve Minutes:
13 January 2010 TC Meeting:
APPROVED unanimously
Reminder of NIST IDTrust Call for Papers
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00006.html
Test Case Repo
Bill noted that svn repo has 1.0 tagged, 1.1 is "trunk" in repo and
that if someone added in v2 we will need to be split it out so that
1.1 can be tagged.
III. Issues
v3 WSDL
Doron offered to investigate contributing a v3 wsdl.
Multi-decision
Jan briefly reviewed his reply to the Users list. Paul agreed that
using Attribute Selector would be difficult to implement.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00022.html
Clarifications on Hierarchical Profile on xacml-users:
rich: messages on this thread are something of a review of the
decisions that went into the current 3.0 profile; no changes
or issues have come up yet.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-users/201101/msg00015.html
Attribute Assertions in XACML request
suggestion (Rich): need to review replies from Greg, Paul:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00026.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00023.html
comment (Erik): following from Erik's email:
Gregory's answer was that with the attribute approach it is necessary to
define an attribute identifier for each conditional one needs to use in
the policy, while this is not necessary with the predicate approach,
which, I agree, is a great benefit.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00018.html
discuss(Paul, Franz-Stefan): Paul's wiki page and Franz-Stefan comments:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201101/msg00021.html
hal, david chadwick had discussion on amf files, as they
relate to user attributes from creds to xacml attrs
on credentials david c addressed topic w cred validation
service, turn them into xacml attrs and feed into pdp
specialized pip - open grid impl - paper in international
journal xacml support multi-domain delegation of authority
see David's pubs at Kent site
used ws-trust to talk to credential validation - in box
standard way. if pep doesn't want to talk to ws-trust they
can use alternative authority
greg: david and he have had discussions on credentials;
cred-based is not what trying to give committee yet.
paul: are david and greg having the same "interpretation"
of "credential"
Stephen legg questions on xacml-comment list
we need to incorporate any fixes etc to errata, new versions
Other business:
hal: next call in 2 weeks: 10-feb-11
meeting adjourned
not discussed yet:
BTG Profile (Break The Glass): (not addressed last mtg so remains on agenda)
original (David): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201011/msg00017.html
PIP directive (additional information directives)
original (David): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201010/msg00005.html
latest: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201012/msg00022.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]