xacml — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [xacml] conformance tests, datatype in attribute value elements of Request.xml files to be removed
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->xacml message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] conformance tests, datatype in attribute value elements of Request.xml files to be removed
- From: Argyn <[email protected]>
- To: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:48:04 -0400
On 9/20/05, Seth Proctor <[email protected]> wrote:
yes, that's what I was going to do. i started removing these attributed from requests already, and will post the update soon.
actually, AttributeValue in context schema allows for DataType attribute, imho, because it has this:
Wow. I'm surprised those are in the tests. I think you should
definitely remove them, since they're quite misleading and arguably
[1] incorrect.
To be clear, what you're talking about is the case where a Request has:
<Attribute DataType="..." ...
<AttributeValue DataType="..." ...
In these cases, you want to remove the DataType attribute in
AttributeValue (which shouldn't actually be recognized by any XACML
processors anyway). Correct?
yes, that's what I was going to do. i started removing these attributed from requests already, and will post the update soon.
seth
[1] The context schema defines its own version of AttributeValue,
which doesn't have the DataType attribute. The schema validation is
passing, I assume, because the AttributeValue is not namespaced
correctly and can therefore be interpreted as an Any element. If it
was correctly reconized as an xacml-context:AttributeValue the schema
validation should fail, since that element doesn't have an attribute.
At least, I think that's right. Does that sound correct to you?
<xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
basically, you can throw in any attribute into AttributeValue.
thanks,
argyn
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Issues for next draft?
- From: Erik Rissanen <[email protected]>
- errata to xacml 2.0 spec?
- From: Argyn <[email protected]>
- Re: [xacml] errata to xacml 2.0 spec?
- From: Polar Humenn <[email protected]>
- conformance tests, datatype in attribute value elements of Request.xml files to be removed
- From: Argyn <[email protected]>
- Re: [xacml] conformance tests, datatype in attribute value elements ofRequest.xml files to be removed
- From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
- Issues for next draft?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]