xacml — archive

Re: [xacml] -dev and -users

From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:57:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] -dev and -users




From: Seth Proctor <[email protected]>
To: James Bryce Clark <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:56:55 -0500







>     Do you folks have any views that you'd care to share with OASIS 
> management about whether the "xacml-users" list and "xacml-dev" list 
> have proved to serve usefully distinct purposes?

In my opinion, it's not so much that the lists host distinct 
discussions, but that they encourage people to use them. That is, were 
there only a -dev list, I think a substantial number of people wouldn't 
use it, thinking that they don't qualify as developers (I say this as 
someone who maintains several mailing lists and discussion forums 
related to XACML). The tone of the lists is slightly different, but not 
dramatically so. Anyway, that's my opinion. I think it's great that 
OASIS is hosting these lists!


seth









References:

-dev and -users
From: James Bryce Clark <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]