xacml — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [xacml] Proposal on item 7 ConditionReference
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->xacml message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xacml] Proposal on item 7 ConditionReference
- From: "Daniel Engovatov" <[email protected]>
- To: "Polar Humenn" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:43:22 -0800
>I think I know where you are going with this, but I don't think the LET >statement will do that for you. What we want is to simply reference values >amongst different rules. Within single policy, or across all policies? Probably I missed something.. I am not suggesting that the proposed idea would not work - just the longer I look at our architecture, the more I feel that more cross policy information needs to be provided. Let expressions being one of them, instead of condition references. Daniel; > For example a place to define five-minutes-from-now attribute of > datetime type defined as (add-time current-time 5 minutes) and so on. > > > Daniel; > >
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]