xacml — archive

[Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] XACML Obligations and SAML Conditions (?)




From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>
To: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:38:50 -0400 (EDT)






On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Frank Siebenlist wrote:

> My feel is that the saml condition is on the assertion level, while the xacml 
> obligation is on the decision response level.
> 
> Does it make sense to have the decision response including the obligations live 
> outside of the assertion?
> If the answer is yes, then that may have answered the question...

I'm not quite sure what you mean.

An obligation is part of the decision response. If we use the SAML
Response to wrap this XACML response, By virtue of being a SAML Response,
does that mean the XACML Response must be an Assertion? So, do you mean by
turning the response into a SAML Assertion that we should strip the
obligations out and put them some where else?

-Polar

> 
> -Frank.
> 
> 







Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] XACML Obligations and SAML Conditions (?)
From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>



References:

XACML Obligations and SAML Conditions (?)
From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]